<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>orangetech.info</title>
	<link>http://orangetech.info</link>
	<description>orangetech is the place to go for the latest buzz on new personal technologies and gadgets. We’ll geting all the latest news in gaming, home theater, gadgets, mobile technology, HDTV and much more, so stay orange</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Telstra, Canberra still at loggerheads</title>
		<link>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/telstra-canberra-still-at-loggerheads/</link>
		<comments>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/telstra-canberra-still-at-loggerheads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Tech News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/telstra-canberra-still-at-loggerheads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[STRONG disagreement continues between Telstra and the federal government on financial compensation to the telco over the NBN program.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STRONG disagreement continues between Telstra and the federal government on financial compensation to the telco over the NBN program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/telstra-canberra-still-at-loggerheads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Live Messenger phone for France is hardly Pink</title>
		<link>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/microsofts-windows-live-messenger-phone-for-france-is-hardly-pink/</link>
		<comments>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/microsofts-windows-live-messenger-phone-for-france-is-hardly-pink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/microsofts-windows-live-messenger-phone-for-france-is-hardly-pink/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft&#8217;s a pretty big company, and while we&#8217;ve been focused on its Windows Phone 7 Series and Pink mobile projects over here in the Land of the Free, its Live Messenger arm has apparently teamed up with French mobile carrier SFR for a branded phone. The Messenger Edition 251 handset looks to be based on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/windows-live-messenger-phone-1.jpg" />Microsoft&#8217;s a pretty big company, and while we&#8217;ve been focused on its <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/WindowsPhone7Series/">Windows Phone 7 Series</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Pink/">Pink</a> mobile projects over here in the Land of the Free, its Live Messenger arm has apparently teamed up with French mobile carrier <a href="http://mobile.engadget.com/tag/sfr">SFR</a> for a branded phone. The Messenger Edition 251 handset looks to be based on Windows Mobile 6.5 (or something older), with no word on who the hardware partner is, and is taking on the youth market just like Pink will presumably be doing Stateside sometime this year. Of course, Messenger is much more popular in Europe than it is in the States, so it makes sense to brand a phone around it, but underneath that candy QWERTY shell we&#8217;re sure those hapless Europeans can find plenty of legacy Windows Mobile to be desperately disappointed in.</p>
<p>[Thanks, Bibo]
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/microsofts-windows-live-messenger-phone-for-france-is-hardly-pi/">Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Live Messenger phone for France is hardly Pink</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/microsofts-windows-live-messenger-phone-for-france-is-hardly-pi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><a href="http://www.mobiletechworld.com/2010/03/16/microsoft-launches-windows-live-messenger-phone/">MobileTechWorld</a><!--//--> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><a href="http://messengersurvotremobile.com/messengeredition251bysfr/">MSN Messenger sur votre mobile</a><!--//--> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19405928/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/microsofts-windows-live-messenger-phone-for-france-is-hardly-pi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/microsofts-windows-live-messenger-phone-for-france-is-hardly-pi/">engadget</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/microsofts-windows-live-messenger-phone-for-france-is-hardly-pink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nokia&#8217;s Design by Community makes smartphone concepting a multiplayer game, with</title>
		<link>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/nokias-design-by-community-makes-smartphone-concepting-a-multiplayer-game-with-limits/</link>
		<comments>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/nokias-design-by-community-makes-smartphone-concepting-a-multiplayer-game-with-limits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/nokias-design-by-community-makes-smartphone-concepting-a-multiplayer-game-with-limits/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Nokia&#8217;s community blog has opened up the crowdsourcing floodgates, at least in theory. For &#8220;Design by Community,&#8221; users will be able to vote on smartphone features via a series of sliders, although within an arbitrary point allotment system. A new poll opens next week for size and shape, followed by materials, operating system (Symbian or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://conversations.nokia.com/design-by-community/"><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/boo-nokia-custom-rm-eng.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>Nokia&#8217;s community blog has opened up the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/06/new-thinkpad-keyboard-features-crowdsourced-design-lower-price/">crowdsourcing</a> floodgates, at least in theory. For &#8220;Design by Community,&#8221; users will be able to vote on smartphone features via a series of sliders, although within an arbitrary point allotment system. A new poll opens next week for size and shape, followed by materials, operating system (Symbian or <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MeeGo/">MeeGo</a> being the only choices, unsurprisingly), and so on in the weeks that follow, with the last poll starting April 26th. After that, a concept sketch will be voted on and later rendered &#8212; but no plans to ever have it made into an actual retail product (boo). We can&#8217;t exactly say we understand all the selections here: why is a touchscreen keyboard less ambitious than T9 text entry? Does saying capacitive is more ambitious than resistive serve as a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/01/nokia-asks-own-blog-readers-whats-their-favorite-part-of-the-x6/">subtle hint</a> of trends to come? What in the world is the difference between hot key and one touch? It&#8217;s interesting to see how <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/X6/">X6</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/N900/">N900</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/N97/">N97</a> all come out as a Perfect Mixes, while last year&#8217;s E75 and the more recent <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/C5/">C5</a> all straddle the &#8220;less than ambitious&#8221; line. Oh, and just so we&#8217;re clear&#8230; a 5-inch, 21:9 ratio display without touchscreen but <em>with</em> a touchscreen keyboard is a perfect mix. Go figure.</p>
<p>[Thanks, Pratik V]
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/nokias-design-by-community-makes-smartphone-concepting-a-multip/">Nokia&#8217;s Design by Community makes smartphone concepting a multiplayer game, with limits</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/nokias-design-by-community-makes-smartphone-concepting-a-multip/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><a href="http://conversations.nokia.com/design-by-community/">Nokia Conversations</a><!--//--> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19405848/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/nokias-design-by-community-makes-smartphone-concepting-a-multip/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/nokias-design-by-community-makes-smartphone-concepting-a-multip/">engadget</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/nokias-design-by-community-makes-smartphone-concepting-a-multiplayer-game-with-limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entelligence: Will Surface ever surface?</title>
		<link>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/entelligence-will-surface-ever-surface/</link>
		<comments>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/entelligence-will-surface-ever-surface/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/entelligence-will-surface-ever-surface/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entelligence is a column by technology strategist and author Michael Gartenberg, a man whose desire for a delicious cup of coffee and a quality New York bagel is dwarfed only by his passion for tech. In these articles, he&#8217;ll explore where our industry is and where it&#8217;s going &#8212; on both micro and macro levels [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Entelligence/"><em><strong>Entelligence</strong></em></a> is a column by technology strategist and author Michael Gartenberg, a man whose desire for a delicious cup of coffee and a quality New York bagel is dwarfed only by his passion for tech. In these articles, he&#8217;ll explore where our industry is and where it&#8217;s going &#8212; on both micro and macro levels &#8212; with the unique wit and insight only he can provide.
</div>
<div>
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/entelligence-will-surface-ever-surface/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/02/2-26-09-surface-boat.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>&#8220;Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.&#8221; I&#8217;d paraphrase Arthur C. Clarke&#8217;s famous quote for the CE market by saying that any sufficiently advanced new product needs to look like it just came off the Starship Enterprise. I&#8217;d say <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/surface">Microsoft Surface</a> was a product that met my definition as well as Clarke&#8217;s when it launched a few years back &#8212; and it should have changed computing quite a bit. Sadly, I haven&#8217;t spoken to the Surface team in a long time and it looks like it may never go anywhere in the end. </p>
<p>The Surface concept was great. It was a Windows PC inside a table with a 30&#8243; touchscreen on top, and cameras that could sense what&#8217;s happening on screen. The result is you could use a Surface device just by touching the screen with your finger &#8212; but unlike other large touch screens at the time, Surface was multitouch, so you could use all your fingers at the same time. More importantly, multiple users could engage with each other. It was a PC but didn&#8217;t look or run like a PC, which was genius &#8212; you&#8217;d never know it was running Windows, but there was no development learning curve. It was totally optimized for that big honking touch surface area, and applications that worked with it &#8212; I&#8217;m sure it could run Office, but that&#8217;s not something it&#8217;s was ever likely to do. Surface was PC evolution happening in real time. It&#8217;s really something you needed to see up close and in thirty seconds before the light bulb went on. Sadly, most people have never seen or worked with a Surface unit. Beyond a small retail rollout at AT&amp;T stores in NY that seems to have ended, the last time I saw one was the Edelman PR offices, where it sat like a large coffee table and did pretty much nothing.
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/entelligence-will-surface-ever-surface/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Entelligence: Will Surface ever surface?</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/entelligence-will-surface-ever-surface/">Entelligence: Will Surface ever surface?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/entelligence-will-surface-ever-surface/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp;  &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19405855/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/entelligence-will-surface-ever-surface/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/entelligence-will-surface-ever-surface/">engadget</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/entelligence-will-surface-ever-surface/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell rolls out Vostro 230 Slim Tower, Mini Tower desktops</title>
		<link>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/dell-rolls-out-vostro-230-slim-tower-mini-tower-desktops/</link>
		<comments>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/dell-rolls-out-vostro-230-slim-tower-mini-tower-desktops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/dell-rolls-out-vostro-230-slim-tower-mini-tower-desktops/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They may not be quite as sleek as their latest laptop counterpart, but Dell&#8217;s two new Vostro 230 desktops are both at least fairly compact and, most importantly, cheap. Available in both Slim Tower or Mini Tower form factors, the desktops start at just $389 or $299, respectively, but can of course be upgraded significantly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?oc=bv1cs4ao&amp;l=en&amp;URL=http%3A%2F%2Fconfigure.us.dell.com%2Fdellstore%2Fconfig.aspx%3Foc%3Dbv1cs4ao&amp;kc=vostro-230st&amp;s=bsd&amp;cs=04&amp;c=us"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="left" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/vostro-230-03-18-2010.jpg" alt="" /></a>They may not be quite as sleek as their <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/17/dell-vostro-v13-review/">latest laptop counterpart</a>, but Dell&#8217;s two new Vostro 230 desktops are both at least fairly compact and, most importantly, cheap. Available in both Slim Tower or Mini Tower form factors, the desktops start at just $389 or $299, respectively, but can of course be upgraded significantly from there, including processors up to a 3.0GHz Core 2 Quad Q9650, a maximum 4GB of RAM, up to 2TB of storage (from two 1TB drives), and your choice of NVIDIA GeForce G310 or GeForce GT220 graphics (in addition to the standard integrated option). Hit up the link below to configure one for yourself.
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/dell-rolls-out-vostro-230-slim-tower-mini-tower-desktops/">Dell rolls out Vostro 230 Slim Tower, Mini Tower desktops</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/dell-rolls-out-vostro-230-slim-tower-mini-tower-desktops/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><a href="http://computermonger.com/dell-vostro-230-slim-mini-tower.html">Computer Monger</a><!--//--> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><a href="http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?oc=bv1cs4ao&amp;l=en&amp;URL=http%3A%2F%2Fconfigure.us.dell.com%2Fdellstore%2Fconfig.aspx%3Foc%3Dbv1cs4ao&amp;kc=vostro-230st&amp;s=bsd&amp;cs=04&amp;c=us">Dell</a><!--//--> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19405680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/dell-rolls-out-vostro-230-slim-tower-mini-tower-desktops/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/dell-rolls-out-vostro-230-slim-tower-mini-tower-desktops/">engadget</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/dell-rolls-out-vostro-230-slim-tower-mini-tower-desktops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube: Viacom would demand removal of videos it covertly uploaded itself</title>
		<link>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/youtube-viacom-would-demand-removal-of-videos-it-covertly-uploaded-itself/</link>
		<comments>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/youtube-viacom-would-demand-removal-of-videos-it-covertly-uploaded-itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/youtube-viacom-would-demand-removal-of-videos-it-covertly-uploaded-itself/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may have heard, Viacom and YouTube have been having a little tift lately, in the form of a major lawsuit by the former over copyrighted material posted on the video portal. It&#8217;s a lawsuit that, according to YouTube, will cause such video sites to &#8220;cease to exist in the current form&#8221; &#8212; but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2010/03/broadcast-yourself.html"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/wild-crazy-kids-yt-rm-eng.jpg" alt="" /></a>As you may have heard, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Viacom/">Viacom</a> and <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/YouTube/">YouTube</a> have been having a little tift lately, in the form of a major lawsuit by the former over copyrighted material posted on the video portal. It&#8217;s a lawsuit that, according to YouTube, will cause such video sites to &#8220;cease to exist in the current form&#8221; &#8212; but more importantly, it&#8217;s a lawsuit that leads to some rather hilarious behind-the-scenes details. Here&#8217;s a really juicy one that the official YT blog published today by Chief Counsel Zahavah Levine. Word has it that Viacom had hired over the years at least 18 different marketing firms to inconspicuously upload content. We can&#8217;t really say it better than the posting:</div>
<blockquote>
<div>&#8220;[Viacom] deliberately &#8220;roughed up&#8221; the videos to make them look stolen or leaked. It opened YouTube accounts using phony email addresses. It even sent employees to Kinko&#8217;s to upload clips from computers that couldn&#8217;t be traced to Viacom.&#8221;</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Wait, it gets better. According to Levine, Viacom&#8217;s tactics were so good that the company itself didn&#8217;t even know which videos it had uploaded, prompting multiple occasions where it would demand a clip removed, only to later ask for its reinstatement. &#8220;In fact,&#8221; he claims, &#8220;some of the very clips that Viacom is suing us over were actually uploaded by Viacom itself.&#8221; Hit up the source link for all the details. Honestly, we can&#8217;t wait to see what else is dug up in these proceedings.
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/youtube-viacom-would-demand-removal-of-videos-it-covertly-uploa/">YouTube: Viacom would demand removal of videos it covertly uploaded itself</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/youtube-viacom-would-demand-removal-of-videos-it-covertly-uploa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/03/18/viacom-youtube">Daring Fireball</a><!--//--> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><a href="http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2010/03/broadcast-yourself.html">YouTube blog</a><!--//--> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19405702/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/youtube-viacom-would-demand-removal-of-videos-it-covertly-uploa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/youtube-viacom-would-demand-removal-of-videos-it-covertly-uploa/">engadget</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/youtube-viacom-would-demand-removal-of-videos-it-covertly-uploaded-itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple still chasing iPad content</title>
		<link>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/apple-still-chasing-ipad-content/</link>
		<comments>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/apple-still-chasing-ipad-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Tech News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/apple-still-chasing-ipad-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[APPLE is still working to secure iPad content as its release nears and the company tempers its ambitions for the much-hyped device.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APPLE is still working to secure iPad content as its release nears and the company tempers its ambitions for the much-hyped device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/apple-still-chasing-ipad-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palm posts $22m Q3 loss, &#8216;making great progress on future products&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-making-great-progress-on-future-products/</link>
		<comments>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-making-great-progress-on-future-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-making-great-progress-on-future-products/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Palm gave us a heads-up back in late February that its upcoming earnings report wouldn&#8217;t exactly be cause for celebration, and today the news has become official: the outfit recorded a net loss of $22 million during its fiscal Q3, which still looks rosy compared to the $98 million loss it suffered this quarter a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://investor.palm.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=453337"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/palm-lobby-headquarters.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>Palm gave us <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/25/palm-sales-lower-than-expected-revenues-to-miss-targets/">a heads-up</a> back in late February that its upcoming earnings report wouldn&#8217;t exactly be cause for celebration, and today the news has become official: the outfit recorded a net loss of $22 million during its fiscal Q3, which still looks rosy compared to the $98 million loss it suffered this quarter a year ago. All told, the firm shipped 960,000 smartphones in the period, which represents a 23 percent uptick from Q2 2010 and a nearly 300 percent increase compared to this quarter in 2009. Unfortunately, sell-through wasn&#8217;t exactly stellar, with just 408,000 units changing hands &#8212; that&#8217;s a 29 percent decline from last quarter and a 15 percent drop year-over-year. We get the impression that it&#8217;s waiting for carriers to get down to replenishment levels, but it&#8217;s hard to say when that&#8217;ll happen. Jon Rubinstein, Palm&#8217;s chairman and CEO, was obviously not thrilled about the news, but he&#8217;s mirroring <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/25/palm-boss-rubenstein-sends-letter-to-employees-talks-turnaround/">statements made to employees</a> just over a fortnight ago with this quote: </p>
<blockquote>
<div><em>&#8220;Our recent underperformance has been very disappointing, but the potential for Palm remains strong. The work we&#8217;re doing to improve sales is having an impact, we&#8217;re making great progress on future products, and we&#8217;re looking forward to upcoming launches with new carrier partners. Most importantly, we have built a unique and highly differentiated platform in webOS, which will provide us with a considerable - and growing - advantage as we move forward.&#8221; </em></div>
</blockquote>
<p>We&#8217;re listening into the earnings call right now, and so far we&#8217;ve heard a few choice quotes. Jon mentioned that Palm has &#8220;aggressive roadmaps on the software front that we&#8217;re working on,&#8221; and that there were &#8220;no changes to our planned carrier launches.&#8221; We&#8217;ll let you know if he introduces the Pixi 2 or anything.
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-making-great-progress-on-future-produc/">Palm posts $22m Q3 loss, &#8216;making great progress on future products&#8217;</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-making-great-progress-on-future-produc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><a href="http://investor.palm.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=453337">Palm</a><!--//--> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19405766/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-making-great-progress-on-future-produc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-making-great-progress-on-future-produc/">engadget</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/palm-posts-22m-q3-loss-making-great-progress-on-future-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile USA eyeing iPhone launch this year or next?</title>
		<link>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/t-mobile-usa-eyeing-iphone-launch-this-year-or-next/</link>
		<comments>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/t-mobile-usa-eyeing-iphone-launch-this-year-or-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/t-mobile-usa-eyeing-iphone-launch-this-year-or-next/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We don&#8217;t like to stir up the nearly constant barrage of &#8220;so-and-so is getting the iPhone&#8221; rumors unless we&#8217;ve got a great reason to do so &#8212; and we&#8217;d argue that a Financial Times report involving statements from Deutsche Telekom&#8217;s CEO qualifies. The British rag was chatting up DT&#8217;s boss over the prospects of its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c1d98e54-322d-11df-b4e2-00144feabdc0.html"><img vspace="16" hspace="4" border="0" align="left" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/t-mobile-iphone-sm.jpg" alt="" /></a>We don&#8217;t like to stir up the nearly constant barrage of &#8220;so-and-so is getting the iPhone&#8221; rumors unless we&#8217;ve got a great reason to do so &#8212; and we&#8217;d argue that a <em>Financial Times</em> report involving statements from Deutsche Telekom&#8217;s CEO qualifies. The British rag was chatting up DT&#8217;s boss over the prospects of its American unit &#8212; T-Mobile USA &#8212; and stressed the company&#8217;s long-term commitment to turning around T-Mobile&#8217;s fortunes in the face of recent <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/04/deutsche-telekom-rumored-to-be-eyeing-t-mobile-usa-spinoff/">spinoff rumors</a>, saying that it&#8217;s all about rapidly building out a speedy 3G network as part of an effort this year &#8220;to lay the foundation for future growth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s where it gets juicy: referring to the iPhone, the report goes on to say that &#8220;T-Mobile USA is hoping to start selling the popular smartphone later  this year or next year&#8221; while focusing on Android in the meantime, as if Android is merely a stopgap measure to make it through to the singular device that can save America&#8217;s number four carrier from going down the tubes. It&#8217;s not clear whether FT got the chief exec making a statement to that effect on the record or it&#8217;s merely gleaning this knowledge from other rumors, but the only way this would be able to happen is if the next iPhone were to come in an <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/AWS/">AWS</a>-compatible version &#8212; and that seems unlikely considering that AWS coverage represents a trivially small fraction of 3G subscribers around the world. Of course, wireless CEOs of all walks of life regularly make statements saying <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/26/verizon-chief-says-offering-the-iphone-is-apples-call/">they&#8217;d be more than happy to carry the iPhone</a> if the opportunity presented itself, so this could be little more than off-the-cuff blather anyway.
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/t-mobile-usa-eyeing-iphone-launch-this-year-or-next/">T-Mobile USA eyeing iPhone launch this year or next?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/t-mobile-usa-eyeing-iphone-launch-this-year-or-next/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;<img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif"><a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/news/comments/t-mobile-usa-to-launch-iphone-in-late-2010-early-2011/">iLounge</a><!--//--> &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c1d98e54-322d-11df-b4e2-00144feabdc0.html">Financial Times</a><!--//--> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19405518/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/t-mobile-usa-eyeing-iphone-launch-this-year-or-next/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/t-mobile-usa-eyeing-iphone-launch-this-year-or-next/">engadget</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/t-mobile-usa-eyeing-iphone-launch-this-year-or-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ: Apple still &#8216;racing&#8217; to complete iPad content deals before launch</title>
		<link>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/wsj-apple-still-racing-to-complete-ipad-content-deals-before-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/wsj-apple-still-racing-to-complete-ipad-content-deals-before-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/wsj-apple-still-racing-to-complete-ipad-content-deals-before-launch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The iPad launch may finally be right around the corner, but it looks like Apple might still have some considerable work cut out for itself before the big day. According to The Wall Street Journal, Apple is still negotiating with various media companies in an effort to drop the price on TV shows offered on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703523204575129862264704190.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/03/03-07-10appleipadas.jpg" /></a></div>
<div>The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/ipad">iPad</a> launch may finally be right around the corner, but it looks like Apple might still have some considerable work cut out for itself before the big day. According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, Apple is still negotiating with various media companies in an effort to drop the price on TV shows offered on the device, and it&#8217;s even reportedly put some potential deals with newspaper, magazine and textbook publishers on the backburner as it focuses on other content. That word comes from the usual, unnamed &#8220;people with the matter,&#8221; who go on to say that it&#8217;s proven to be difficult to convince potential content partners of the advantages of working with Apple on the iPad versus the possible threats to their current sources of revenue.</div>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/wsj-apple-still-racing-to-complete-ipad-content-deals-before/">WSJ: Apple still &#8216;racing&#8217; to complete iPad content deals before launch</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.engadget.com">Engadget</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p>
<h6></h6>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/wsj-apple-still-racing-to-complete-ipad-content-deals-before/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703523204575129862264704190.html">Wall Street Journal</a><!--//--> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/forward/19405739/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/wsj-apple-still-racing-to-complete-ipad-content-deals-before/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/18/wsj-apple-still-racing-to-complete-ipad-content-deals-before/">engadget</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://orangetech.info/2010/03/18/wsj-apple-still-racing-to-complete-ipad-content-deals-before-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
